Stop yer bitchin' and deal with the voting wait!

From Campbell Brown's commentary, "Wait is small price to pay for voting":

"So what if you have to wait a few hours? I was in Baghdad for the first Iraqi elections. Remember that? Bombs were going off, and all those people were showing up to get that purple ink stain on their finger. We can all certainly suck it up for a couple of hours if we have to." (Click here to read the full commentary)

Can I get an AMEN, people?

Brown's commentary merely echoes what I've been saying and thinking for years - that in certain other countries, people risk being killed, raped, tortured or imprisoned when they venture out to vote, and in many cases, if they do manage to make it through the gunfire, intimidation from corrupt election workers, etc. to get to the ballot box, their vote ends up counting for naught because of corrupt election practices such as ballot box stuffing and voter fraud.

We've got it GREAT in this country compared to them.

So, don't you bitch about the wait being too long at the polls. There but for the grace of God were you born in this country instead of somewhere else, and you could be one of these poor shmucks running through a hail of flying bullets to get to the ballot box.

Obama Claus

A great article by ABC News Senior National Correspondent Jake Tapper.

"Once you get past the soaring oratory, to experience a speech by Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., is to be hit with an astoundingly lengthy list of promises.

"I don't know how any reasonable person" could think he'd really be able to accomplish everything he's pledging to do, said the mother-in-law of a colleague, a Missouri woman who intends to vote for Obama.

Just today in Sarasota, Fla., the Democratic presidential nominee said that he'd: ..." Click here to read more.

Below Tapper's article was a compelling argument posted by a reader, Dr_Applebreath, that got my attention:

"How Reason Works

What if Obama had the strongest record of bipartisanship in the Senate, with major bills to his credit like the 2002 McCain-Feingold campaign reform, the 2003 McCain-Lieberman climate stewardship and the 2007 McCain-Kennedy immigration reform acts.
What if McCain had the most extreme partisan voting record in the Senate?

What if Obama offered a broad, sensible energy policy that embraced both emerging and current resources, including building the greenest power plants possible with nukes?

What if McCain declared that the nuclear waste technology we've invested hundreds of billions in over the last three decades is unacceptable, and refused to build nukes until we invent something better than Yucca Mountain?

What if Obama offered sensible tax policies that have historically led to healthy business growth and financial freedom for more Americans?

What if McCain promised to cut taxes for 95% of us while proposing almost a trillion dollars in new spending?

What if Obama had called for reform and oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2006 that could have prevented the current financial collapse, only to have his efforts squashed by the opposition party?

What if McCain was the second highest recipient of political donations from Fannie and Freddie in his short Senate career, and had the former head of Freddie heading up his VP-vetting team, and the WaPo published the fact that the disgraced former head of Fannie was a financial advisor to his campaign?

What if Obama had been the leading supporter of the surge strategy that has won the war in Iraq?

What if McCain's primary claim to fame was his leading the charge to lose the war by withdrawing all our forces in Iraq where Al Qaeda declared their new caliphate?

What if Michelle Obama devoted her time and wealth to charitable organizations over the last couple of decades, and she adopted a Bangladeshi girl with a cleft palate on a visit to one of Mother Teresa's orphanages?

What if Cindy McCain got a $200,000 raise in her job as a Community Relations Director in a hospital when her husband became a Senator, and once in the Senate her husband put in a $1M earmark for her employer U of Chi Hospital, and she declared that when her husband won the nomination for Presidency was the first time she was really proud of her country?

What if Joe Biden had a proven record of opposing his own party and winning, and confronting Big Oil and winning, and sharing the revenues he levied on Big Oil with the citizens of his state?

What if Sarah Palin imagined we and the French "kicked Hezbollah out of Lebanon" and said President Roosevelt "went on TV in 1929" (before TV existed) to talk to Americans about the Depression (before FDR became President in 1933)?

Well, hell, I'd vote for Obama. There's nothing racist about it."

Heh, heh. Things are getting even more interesting than I thought!

Senator Obama's Four Tax Increases for People Earning Under $250K

A very good article by Ned Barnett in The American Thinker that pinpoints four major discrepancies/lies in Obama's "No Tax Increase for People Earning Under $250K" tax plan.

"I worked as the state level media and strategy director on three Presidential election campaigns -- I know how "promises" work -- so I analyzed Senator Obama's promises by looking for loopholes.

"The first loophole was easy to find: Senator Obama doesn't 'count' allowing the Bush tax cuts to lapse as a tax increase. Unless the cuts are re-enacted, rates will automatically return to the 2000 level. Senator Obama claims that letting a tax cut lapse -- allowing the rates to return to a higher levels -- is not actually a 'tax increase.' It's just the lapsing of a tax cut.

"See the difference?

"Neither do I."

Click here to read the full article.